Summary | Identifying missing content requests due to miscommunication around the keyword audit and planning to fulfill those in a future month. |
|---|---|
Target release | Feb 28, 2023 |
Priority | |
Project status | Done |
Progress | 100% |
Brand | DS ARI |
Owner | @Katie Hill |
Team | @Grant Gooch |
Status Note | |
Key Dates | Apr 4, 2023 Complete. |
Resources | |
Expected impact | |
Actual impact |
Overview
Start Date: Feb 14, 2023
End Date:
Feb 14, 2023 Created plan and sheet for the audit.
Feb 24, 2023 audit sheet completed for DS & ARI, team to catch up content in March.
Mar 3, 2023 sheet was shared with the teams, and reps are posting the Trello card links after requesting - Katie checking links and updating sheet daily.
Mar 17, 2023 sheet was updated and reps were reminded to finish creating Feb makeup requests. 7 more for DS and 11 for ARI left.
Mar 24, 2023 All requests have been made except 1 DS client - will follow up w/the rep on Monday.
Apr 4, 2023 all remaining requests have been made and project is complete.
Description
Due to a miscommunication about content requirements with the keyword audit, we are missing some content requests for Feb.
Why
We need to deliver everything they are paying for.
Expected Impact
Content will have to be submitted late and filled by the content team, although they should have capacity since they can get ahead in March.
Emoji :checkered_flag: Milestones / Project Timeline
Emoji :check_mark: Next Actions
Emoji :question_mark: Questions
Questions | Answer | Who | When | Where (Meeting) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
If content is not requested or created in the month of February, should reps still create a line for it in the WD Import to include in reporting that says the work is still in progress? | No, content that is requested late this month will be reported on in the month that the content is published. We want to avoid tons of in-progress WD lines that may lead dealers to believe we are slacking in fulfilling their package requirements. | @Gabriel Reyes | ||
If content is created in a future month to catch up on the Feb. package requirements and is reported on for that future month, will it need to be moved back to the February work section once reporting is over? | It shouldn’t need to be moved as it doesn’t affect monthly reporting, but may show up in quarterly reporting that we did more work in one month to catch up for another. | |||
Are there QA issues that could arise by having February content reported on in future months? Will QA call out WD Imports that appear to have more than the package requirements fulfilled in a single month? | @Ned Faulhaber |
Decisions
Decision | Why | Who | When | Where (Meeting) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
*Primary decision maker in bold.