Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Page Properties

Summary

Identifying missing content requests due to miscommunication around the keyword audit and planning to fulfill those in a future month.

Target release

Priority

Project status

Status
colourPurple
titleDone

Progress

Status
title100%

Brand

Status
colourGreen
titleDS
Status
colourGreen
titleARI

Owner

Katie Hill

Team

Grant Gooch

Status Note

Key Dates

Complete.

Resources

Expected impact

Actual impact

Table of Contents
minLevel1
maxLevel1

...

Start Date:

End Date:

Created plan and sheet for the audit.

audit sheet completed for DS & ARI, team to catch up content in March.

sheet was shared with the teams, and reps are posting the Trello card links after requesting - Katie checking links and updating sheet daily.

sheet was updated and reps were reminded to finish creating Feb makeup requests. 7 more for DS and 11 for ARI left.

All requests have been made except 1 DS client - will follow up w/the rep on Monday.

all remaining requests have been made and project is complete.

Description

Due to a miscommunication about content requirements with the keyword audit, we are missing some content requests for Feb.

...

🏁 Milestones / Project Timeline

  •   Created an audit sheet and communicated the plan to Katie.
  •  Katie will update the audit sheet with findings

...

  •  

Questions

Answer

Who

When

Where (Meeting)

If content is not requested or created in the month of February, should reps still create a line for it in the WD Import to include in reporting that says the work is still in progress?

No, content that is requested late this month will be reported on in the month that the content is published. We want to avoid tons of in-progress WD lines that may lead dealers to believe we are slacking in fulfilling their package requirements.

Gabriel Reyes

If content is created in a future month to catch up on the Feb. package requirements and is reported on for that future month, will it need to be moved back to the February work section once reporting is over?

It shouldn’t need to be moved as it doesn’t affect monthly reporting, but may show up in quarterly reporting that we did more work in one month to catch up for another.

Are there QA issues that could arise by having February content reported on in future months? Will QA call out WD Imports that appear to have more than the package requirements fulfilled in a single month?

Ned Faulhaber

Decisions

Decision

Why

Who

When

Where (Meeting)

...